Friday, March 25, 2011

Course Relection - Where did this five weeks go?

As I reflect back over the past five weeks, I realize that not only did I grow as a student; I also grew as a professional. I have learned the ‘art’ of reflecting. Reflection is an important leadership skill because it provides the ability to think more deeply about problems and allows the leader to have the ability to take action or make adjustments accordingly. (Martin et al., 2005) After I submitted each week’s assignment, I took some time to make notes of the most important key concepts I learned that week, and kept them in a journal. This will be very beneficial in the future as I transition to the role of administrator.

I have learned a great deal about action research. Like most other students, I was terrified of this course. I had built a pre-conceived idea that a research class meant countless, tiring hours looking up information I cared nothing about. Then the six letter word ‘action’ was inserted before research, and that changed everything.  When I first read the definition from Dana’s text, “Simply stated, administrator inquiry refers to the process of a principal engaging in systematic, intention study of his/her own administrative practice and taking action for change based on what he/she learns as a result of the inquiry” (Dana, 2009, p. 2), I was a little less terrified and more knowledgeable of what we were being asked to do. For the lack of a better word, I was giddy that I was going to be able to pick my own topic and conduct action research on a topic that was relevant to my district and campus. What a concept!

In addition to learning that action research can actually be enjoyable, I learned three strategies that could be used to support and sustain action research. From our Harris text, I learned about three strategies: Force Field Analysis, Delphi Method, and Nominal Group Technique.  Remembering these strategies and being able to implement them as an administrator will be very beneficial to our campus and district.  In our week four assignment, I learned that following the steps outlined in the Harris text to conduct a Force Field Analysis in our new mentoring program would be most beneficial. 

Our weekly discussion board posts have been very insightful. I think the most beneficial part of the discussion board, is that we are able relate to other students and make sure we are on the right track with our plan. I would always second guess myself when answering discussion board prompts and would wait for a few people to post their responses before I did. It was always a relief to see how they responded and know that I was on the right track initially. It was validation that I was actually understanding and doing what was required. I was able to learn how to give suggestions to others without being negative, and receive positive criticism without taking it personally.

BLOG. That is a word that terrified me in the past. I am not a blogger and at first, didn’t see the relevance in creating and maintain a blog for this course and for the life of our action research. I couldn’t have been more wrong. My blog and blogs of my peers have been the most help to me during this course. I appreciated and welcomed all the comments I received on my blog postings, because it helped me adjust and make additional changes to my action research that I would not have thought about. Using a blog to communicate your action research plan and progress is a great accountability tool. It helps the researcher stay on task and meet timelines.

The weekly web conferences were wonderful. It was nice to be able to put a face to the names we see weekly on the discussion boards and to actually see our professor. I participated every week on the web conferences. Some weeks, I really didn’t have any questions or concerns, but I joined in because someone always inevitably asked a question I SHOULD have and that pertained to my situation. I learned that I needed to participate in everything provided to me as a student, so that I could get the most from this class and program.

References
Dana, N.F. (2009). Leading with Passion and Knowledge: The Principals Action Researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Martin, G.E., Wright, W. F., Danzig, A. B., Flanary, R. A., & Brown, F. (2005). School Leader Internship. New York, NY: Eye On Education, Inc.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

HOT OFF THE PRESS: Revised and Approved

I have received approval for my action research plan (received 3/21/2011) from my site supervisor. I made a few revisions, not so much with content, but broke it down into a few additional detailed steps.

I also started pulling TAKS data from our EduGence System. EduGence is the data warehouse that our district utilizes to store all testing results district wide, AND flags students who are targeted for intervention. It has taken me a little longer to pull the data I need, since I had to learn how to navigate the system. I am glad that I started as planned and gave myself plenty of time to pull and evaluate this data.

To help myself and other visualize my progress, I will be periodically posting updated pieces of my plan that will be color coded. RED will indicate COMPLETED and GREEN will indicate IN PROGRESS.


Action Steps(s)        
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline: Start/End
Resources  
Evaluation
Meet with site supervisor to obtain approval of action research plan
Amy Clark (self) and Cheryl Alexander (site supervisor)
2/29/11 – 3/21/11
*Internship Plan
*TAKS data
*Approval of topic
Collect and disaggregate AEIS and Edugence reports
Amy Clark
3/21/11 – 5/1/11
*Edugence System
*AEIS reports for campus
*Collection of data
Develop anonymous teacher survey. Input questions to Survey Monkey. Obtain approval to submit to teachers.
Amy Clark – survey
Cheryl Alexander – approval
3/24/11 – 4/15/11
*Survey Monkey
*Feedback and approval from site supervisor



REVISED AND APPROVED:

ACTION RESEARCH PLAN 7.1 Tool

GOAL: To increase student performance on state assessments in the African American male population on campus by implementing an after school ‘mentoring’ program for this subgroup in response to research.

Action Steps(s)        
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline: Start/End
Resources  
Evaluation
Meet with site supervisor to obtain approval of action research plan
Amy Clark (self) and Cheryl Alexander (site supervisor)
2/29/11 – 3/21/11
*Internship Plan
*TAKS data
*Approval of topic
Collect and disaggregate AEIS and Edugence reports
Amy Clark
3/21/11 – 5/1/11
*Edugence System
*AEIS reports for campus
*Collection of data
Develop anonymous teacher survey. Input questions to Survey Monkey. Obtain approval to submit to teachers.
Amy Clark – survey
Cheryl Alexander – approval
3/24/11 – 4/15/11
*Survey Monkey
*Feedback and approval from site supervisor
Present action research topic and overview to staff at Steadham Elementary. Distribute anonymous teacher survey view Survey Monkey.
Amy Cark
4/22/11 – faculty meeting
*Power Point presentation
*Link to Survey Monkey – anonymous teacher survey
*Response to presentation. *Results collected from survey.
Select sample group
Amy Clark and Cheryl Alexander
5/1/11 – 5/15/11
*TAKS data from past 3 years (AEIS)
*Discussion with classroom teachers
Develop survey for parents.
Amy Clark
3/21/11 – 4/30/22
*Parent Survey
*Feedback from site supervisor
Meet with site supervisor to obtain approval to distribute survey
Amy Clark and Cheryl Alexander
5/1/11 – 5/15/2011
*Copy of  survey

*Approval of survey
Distribute survey to parents and teachers
Amy Clark
5/16/11 – 5/18/11
*Survey
*Survey Monkey link
*Survey results
Review literature related to poor student performance in the African American male population
Amy Clark
3/21/11 – 7/1/11
*Peer reviewed literature related to study
*Comparison to current demographic at site campus
Disaggregate survey results
Amy Clark
6/1/11 – 8/1/11
*surveys
*Information from Survey Monkey
*Survey results
Compile data and present to campus
Amy Clark, Cheryl Alexander
8/1/11 – 9/1/11
*Literature review data
*Survey data
*TAKS data
*Feedback from campus staff and site supervisor
Write conclusion paper and proposal for mentoring/tutoring program
Amy Clark
8/1/11 – 9/1/11
*Literature review data
*Survey data
*TAKS data
*Feedback from campus staff and site supervisor
Present research results to campus faculty
Amy Clark

9/2011
*Handouts with research data (results)
*Power Point
*Plan of Action for mentoring program
*Feedback from campus staff and site supervisor
AFTER RESEARCH:
Implement after school mentoring/tutoring program
Amy Clark, Cheryl Alexander, staff at Steadham Elementary
9/1/11  -
*Action Research results

*Student performance on STAAR for 2011 – 2012 school year
Monitor benchmark and curriculum assessments (CA’s) scores
Amy Clark
9/2011 – 6/2012
*EduGence
*Student performance on benchmarks and CA’s

Template was received from the following source on page 85:

Harris, S., Edmonson, S., Combs, J. (2010). Examining What We Do to Improve Our Schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Surveys and Legalities?

I may be looking a little deeper into this than I should, but I want to make sure I'm doing it RIGHT!

As far as parent and teacher surveys are concerned. Are there certain things we can't ask? If it is an anonymous survey, can I ask what the family household income is? Or should I just use the economically disadvantaged numbers that we already have, and leave that question alone????

I've been reading thru a few blogs tonight, and we all talk about our 'surveys' that we are going to implement. But not a soul has mentioned what he/she is going to include in these surveys.

SUGGESTIONS? GUIDANCE? HELP?

Sunday, March 13, 2011

It's finally coming together!

After numerous revisions, I finally have a plan. I am sure once I get started, this plan will change a bit, but it sure feels good to see it in writing (and the end date as well)!

ACTION RESEARCH PLAN 7.1 Tool

GOAL: To increase student performance on state assessments in the African American male population on campus by implementing an after school ‘mentoring’ program for this subgroup in response to research.
Action Steps(s)                     Person(s)                     Timeline:                        Resources                        Evaluation
                                       Responsible                   Start/End

1.Meet with site supervisor to obtain approval of action research plan
Amy Clark (self) and Cheryl Alexander (site supervisor)
2/29/11 – 3/21/11
*Internship Plan
*TAKS data
Approval of topic
2. Collect and disaggregate AEIS and Edugence reports
Amy Clark
3/21/11 – 5/1/11
*Edugence System
*AEIS reports for campus
Collection of data
3.Select sample group
Amy Clark and Cheryl Alexander
5/1/11 – 5/15/11
*TAKS data from past 3 years (AEIS)
Discussion with classroom teachers
4. Create surveys for parents and teachers
Amy Clark
3/21/11 – 4/30/22
*Survey Monkey
*Sample parent surveys

Feedback from teachers and site supervisor, survey results
5. Meet with site supervisor to obtain approval to distribute survey
Amy Clark and Cheryl Alexander
5/1/11 – 5/15/2011
*Copy of  survey
*Link (Survey Monkey)
Approval of survey
6. Distribute survey to parents and teachers
Amy Clark
5/16/11 – 5/18/11
*Survey
*Survey Monkey link
Survey results
7. Review literature related to poor student performance in the African American male population
Amy Clark
3/21/11 – 7/1/11
*Peer reviewed literature related to study
Comparison to current demographic at site campus
8. Disaggregate survey results
Amy Clark
6/1/11 – 8/1/11
*surveys
*Information from Survey Monkey
Survey results
9.Compile data and present to campus
Amy Clark, Cheryl Alexander
8/1/11 – 9/1/11
*Literature review data
*Survey data
*TAKS data
*Feedback from campus staff and site supervisor
10. Write conclusion paper and proposal for mentoring/tutoring program
Amy Clark
8/1/11 – 9/1/11
*Literature review data
*Survey data
*TAKS data
*Feedback from campus staff and site supervisor
11. Present research results to campus faculty
Amy Clark

9/2011
*Handouts with research data (results)
*Power Point
*Plan of Action for mentoring program
*Feedback from campus staff and site supervisor
12. Implement after school mentoring/tutoring program
Amy Clark, Cheryl Alexander, staff at Steadham Elementary
9/1/11
*Action Research results

*Student performance on STAAR for 2011 – 2012 school year


Template was received from the following source on page 85:

Harris, S., Edmonson, S., Combs, J. (2010). Examining What We Do to Improve Our Schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.